Convergence vs Conversion: A Subtle but Powerful Distinction

It would be remiss of us to explore the convergence of people’s thinking vs conversion of them without first leading with what we favor: convergence — which, in our view, is best described as detailed, non-imposing, and inquisitive behavior.

So we’ll lead with this: what follows is simply our concept, not a universal truth. And we’ll do our best to try to remain true to convergence itself — by being as detailed, non-imposing, and inquisitive as we can be.

Now, with that spirit in mind…

Our view is that conversion is the act of pulling someone toward your point of view — often forcefully, sometimes dogmatically. It tends to emerge from a strong sense of certainty or urgency, where the aim is to change someone — typically without changing yourself. In this frame, dialogue becomes a tool for persuasion rather than exploration.

By contrast, our concept of convergence is far more collaborative. It’s not about being right — it’s about being open. Convergence is detailed because it honors complexity. It’s non-imposing because it allows space for others to respond freely. And it’s inquisitive because it leads with questions, not assumptions.

We believe that SpatzAI is designed to help move people from trying to convert one another toward the more sustainable practice of converging. It provides a simple structure for addressing micro-conflicts fairly and calmly — not to win, but to understand.

In a world where social media seems hell-bent on conversion — where shouting, certainty, and spectacle dominate — we see convergence as a quiet revolution.

And we don’t ask you to agree.
We simply invite you to explore this idea… with us.