I have been thinking about a possibility that sits at the heart of workplace conflict research. What if disagreement and conflict are not the same thing? Reference: Understand Conflict Most conflict researchers seem to define conflict broadly enough to include disagreements....

Addressing Workplace Impingements

For years I've been interested in workplace conflict or micro-conflicts, but lately I've been thinking about something even smaller. Not conflict. Not even an infringement. An impingement or someone impinging on the other player's space. In soccer, a player can subtly tug an opponent's shirt. It may be almost invisible. The referee might miss it. The crowd certainly won't notice most of the time....

Ignoring is Ignorant Behavior

Ignoring is one of the quietest ways minor workplace tension becomes conflict. That is: Not answering. Not acknowledging. Letting a concern hang in the air. The difficulty is that “ignoring” is hard to prove. A person can always say they missed it, were busy, misunderstood, or did not think a response was needed.

SpatzAI: Building a Category Before the Category Exists

I recently saw a post about how Taiwan became the centre of the world’s semiconductor industry. The simple version is this: Taiwan did not begin with a semiconductor industry. It began with a plan, selected people, serious training, and time to learn. In 1974, Taiwan sent 19 hand-picked engineers to RCA in America to learn how to build chips. They had no mature industry, no deep experience, and no category to slot neatly into. What they had was a foundational bet.

Everyone Deserves an Early Warning.

Teams still seem to lack a practical and proportionate way to signal that an interaction may be drifting off course before it escalates into resentment, disengagement, formal complaints, or conflict. This is one of the main reasons I created SpatzAI. SpatzAI is designed as an early warning system for conflict. Not punishment. Not public shaming. Not an anonymous HR ambush three weeks later. An early warning system requiring an accountable response.

Mary Parker Follett, SpatzAI & the Future of Disagreements

Mary Parker Follett was ahead of her time in how she understood conflict. By 1924, she had already articulated her framework of domination, compromise, and integration, later presented clearly in her 1925 paper, Constructive Conflict. She did not see conflict simply as something to suppress or avoid. Instead, she saw it as a possible source of learning, creativity, and mutual understanding.

Ideas Assembly Line: Early Quality Control for Team Thinking

I think most teams run an "ideas-assembly-line" without realising it. Ideas move from person to person, meeting to meeting, slowly taking shape. But unlike a factory floor, there’s usually no explicit quality control built into the flow. So small issues get waved through. A comment that lands poorly. A challenge that feels one-sided. A tone that creates friction.

Still Cleaning Up the Manure at Your Workplace

Most people can see the problem. Employees stay silent. Warnings are missed. Risks are hidden. Bad behaviour is tolerated. Retaliation is feared. Boards and leaders are surprised by issues that many people lower down already knew about. There is even a new name for it when these things are present it is considered there is a lack of "psychological safety".

Workplace Teams’ Personal Real-Time Referee & VAR

In soccer, the referee does not wait until the match is over or contact the player the following week to review their fouls. They step in during play, as it happens. Sometimes it is just a quiet word. Sometimes it is a whistle or a card. And when the decision is disputed or serious, VAR - Video Assisted Referee, can help review what happened.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑