This is a typical speel of most posts one reads nowadays on Linkedin using cliches and platitudes to somehow try encourage this behavior, however most leave it at that and expect managers somehow to navigate this complicated area of workplace relationships.
Prefacing: We Think it Prevents Dogmatic, Polarized Conflicts
In today's polarized climate, the SpatzAI team thinks it's increasingly vital to approach conversations with care, particularly in professional environments where collaboration is key....
Questioning Certainty: The Toxic Impact of Dogma on Workplace Teams?
In the world where most workplaces can use more creativity and innovation, the presence of toxic dogma can act as a significant barrier.....
SpatzAI: A Fair Play Approach to Resolving Conflicts
For me, there is nothing wrong with "attacking" an idea, during a disagreement. However, it is when we unfairly challenge the person with that idea that it becomes a problem. But even attacking the person unfairly is allowed, as long as there is an agreed procedure to address such misbehavior.
Coral Quarrels: Spats Over Snaps in Paradise
Recently I had a spat with my friend over me taking a revealing photo of her in a bikini on a coral beach island off Phuket. She thought it was unfair that I sent the photo to my other friend without getting her consent but I was arguing that if she did not wish me to send to anyone then she should tell me first....
No Shit, Sherlock: The Essential Guide to Navigating Organizational “Sewerage”
It occurs to me that both in ancient and modern civilizations, one foundational truth has stood the test of time: thriving communities first and foremost address their sewerage problems. The accumulation of waste, if left unchecked, can lead to disastrous consequences, marring the very essence of civilization with disease, discomfort, and decline.
STAR – The Spatz Team-Assisted Review Platform
The SpatzAI referee toolkit attributes its protective capabilities to the STAR platform by providing a transparent peer review process for resolving team minor spats, disputes and conflicts. Here is how it is integrated:
SpatzAI: The Fearless and Cautionary Buddha
Reflecting on this, I couldn't help but draw parallels with the SpatzAI toolkit I've been advocating for in the workplace: the initial act of giving a cautionary warning to a colleague when their behavior may be about to become problematic.
A STAR is Born – Embracing Micro-Conflict Resolution in Teams
In the realm of team dynamics, micro-conflicts are inevitable. However, the manner in which these conflicts are addressed significantly impacts the team's cohesion, productivity, and overall psychological well-being. Enter STAR (Spatz Team-Assisted Review), a concept platform....
What is SpatzAI in a Nutshell – Fair Play
SpatzAI is designed as a referee intervention toolkit for creating a constructive and fair team environment, ensuring that every member can fairly express their ideas and concerns knowing that they are protected from unfair treatment.
The Spatz and SpatzAI Protocols
So my summary of our conversation is to NEGOTIATE BEFORE you or her do anything. And to negotiate effectively you will both need an agreed-to plan for what is fair and unfair method of making proposals. This plan that I have for myself is no browbeating or unfair naysaying, and basically no anger or I will object in 3 phases And that is it.
Complacent Listening: A Comparative Analysis with the SpatzAI Model
In the quest to foster psychological safety and encourage open dialogue within teams, leaders often face the paradox of encouraging feedback while personally navigating their responses to potentially unsettling news.
The Wronged Kind of Right – The Perils of Complacency in Organizational Communication
In the dynamic theater of organizational operations, the exchange of ideas and information stands as the backbone of success and innovation. However, there lurks a silent saboteur in the form of complacency, particularly in how we receive and process feedback that challenges our competence and intentions.
Psychological Safety as Easy as 1,2,3
If psychological safety is being in a safe space or environment where one can speak up without fear of suffering any unfair repercussions then I think that all we need is a system to resolve what is an actual fair or unfair repercussion.
Psychological PPE: The Evolution of Psychological Safety in Team Dynamics
There is a growing concern suggests that the quest for psychological safety might be veering into the territory of toxic positivity, rendering individuals hesitant to speak up. This seems to be especially apparent when there now appears to be an obvious flaw in the standard psychological model.....
Toxic Positivity
I just read this article on positive toxicity which inspired me to put fingers to keyboard, here. I believe that applying positive reframing to an insult could inadvertently lead to toxic positivity, especially if it involves ignoring the real harm caused by uncivil behavior and overemphasizing a positive outlook.
A Referee Toolkit to Resolve Unfair Play in Teams
We believe that having a objective, unbiased mechanism to address unfair challenges is crucial in teams.
The Dynamics of Unfair Naysaying vs. Fair Pushback in Teams
Unfair Naysaying Vs Fair Pushback In the collaborative landscape of ideas and innovation, the exchange of feedback is as vital as the ideas themselves. However, this exchange often spirals into a complex feedback loop of perception and response, particularly when distinguishing between "unfair naysaying" and "fair pushback." Understanding this dynamic and addressing it effectively is... Continue Reading →
SpatzAI: The Office Referee Keeping Idea Challenges in Check
Just like a well-coordinated soccer match, a successful workplace team relies on a balance between collaboration and competition, openness and challenge, psychological safety and intellectual honesty......
Psychological Safety AI Intervention Plugin
The SpatzAI Intervention App and Platform Our latest pivot is as follows; We believe that we can integrate SpatzAI as a behavior-failure, AI intervention plugin within the standard psychological safety model and think it presents a compelling and innovative add-on to managing team dynamics. BEHAVIOR FAILURE: Our concept acknowledges a critical reality in team interactions:... Continue Reading →
Psychological Stupidity
How stupid is this? In team psychology, we all want team members and managers to speak up more, right? We all realize that what prevents us from speaking up with controversial or dissenting views is the possibility of being browbeaten with unfair naysaying, and inevitably, a conflict arises. But instead of creating a simple intervention... Continue Reading →
Psychological Safety in Teams: The SpatzAI Approach vs the Traditional Model
In exploring the purpose of psychological safety within teams, we think it is crucial to shift the focus from WHAT it is or is not, to WHY it is necessary and how it can be effectively implemented. Psychological safety is not just a buzzword, (although that seems to be what it has become)....
Right Kind of Wrong Part II: Failure to Behave
While we readily discuss the constructive aspects of failing in tasks or projects, there's a significant area often left unexamined - failing to behave appropriately within a team. This oversight can lead to a detrimental impact on team dynamics and overall organizational health.
What is Psychological Safety? Vs How is it Achieved?
In stead of asking; "what is psychological safety?", maybe a better question to ask, so as to understand it better would be; "how is psychological safety achieved?" “Psychological safety is an atmosphere where one can take chances……….without fear and with sufficient protection.” EDGAR SCHEIN & WARREN BENNIS 1965 – PSYCHOLOGICAL SAFETY – WIKIPEDIA
SpatzAI and the Art of Painless Conflict Resolution in Teams
No one particularly enjoys conflict, akin to the fear many feel towards a dentist's visit. However, both are inevitable elements in our life and work. We believe the ideal approach shouldn't be about avoiding workplace conflict but making its resolution as painless and constructive as possible.
“That Will Never Work!”: Confronting Dogmatic Negativity in Team Discussions
In the quest for psychological safety within team environments, a key hurdle often encountered is the practice of browbeating with unfair dogmatic naysaying. This phenomenon, where individuals are discouraged from speaking up due to fear of negative repercussions, is a significant barrier to achieving the 'holy grail' of psychological safety in teams
Spatz GPT Our Little Helper
Just training the Spatz GPT to be more user friendly....
Enhancing Psychological Safety in Teams, Spat by Spat: A Practical Approach
In the dynamic landscape of team collaboration, the concept of 'psychological safety' has emerged as a cornerstone for productive and innovative team dynamics. However, transforming this concept or belief into a tangible reality within teams requires more than just 'fostering' a 'safe environment' through rhetoric, cliches and platitudes.
Maybe SpatzAI GPT is Already Smarter than Most “Experts” in the Field of Team Dynamics?
I asked the SpatzAI this question below and I have a feeling that this AI is smarter than most experts promoting their version of psychological safety and team dynamics...
Proactive Conflict Resolution: Empowering Teams with SpatzAI
In today's fast-paced and collaborative work environments, conflicts and disputes are bound to arise. Traditional conflict resolution models often focus on post-conflict intervention, leaving issues to escalate and negatively impact teamwork and productivity.
Tit for Spat: How Reacting in Kind Fuels Workplace Team Micro-conflicts
In the world of workplace dynamics, conflicts often start small, like sparks before a fire. These minor disagreements and irritations, known as spats, can have a tendency to escalate, sometimes even turning into full-blown conflicts. But why does this happen, and how can we prevent it?
Amy Edmondson’s Take on Addressing Insults: Reframing vs. Speaking Up
Amy Edmondson - premier exponent of psychological safety Part transcript from the Chas Jarvis podcast"Why we need to talk about failure with Amy Edmondson" In a recent interview with Chas Jarvis (September 6, 2023) Amy Edmondson recommends how we should avoid potential conflict in teams. Amy Edmondson:"Someone says something in a meeting that you instantly... Continue Reading →
Eight Reasons Why SpatzAI Is the Future of Conflict Resolution
As an AI psychologist, I can provide insights into potential challenges or limitations of the proposed concept for managing workplace micro-conflicts using the the SpatzAI 3-step procedure of "Caution," "Object," and "Stop" approach:
Creating Harmony Amidst Micro-conflicts: A Workplace Toolkit for Teams
Imagine a workplace where team members can navigate the subtle undercurrents of disagreement and micro-conflict with ease. A place where dogmatic behavior and misunderstandings are minimized, and open collaboration thrives.
Empowering Whistleblowers: Australia’s Bold Move to Ensure Transparency and Accountability
*Disclaimer: This Article is Pure Fiction for Entertainment Purposes Only. Attention All Organizations and Whistleblowers: Breaking News—All organizations in Australia to supply whistles with yellow and red cards by mid of 2024, for any potential whistleblowers in organizations.
Cracking the Golden Rule in Business: Harnessing SpatzAI to Resolve Minor Misbehavior and Spats
It appears to me that nobody has really cracked the model for making sure they are always treated well and treat each other well, would you agree? Many claim they know the way, either religious leaders or even some business leaders. It is the holy grail that we all seem to crave but fail on the next argument we have.
Nip Minor Misbehavior or Spats in the Bud
Who can deny that it is better to nip minor misbehavior in the bud rather than let this behavior and others reaction to it escalate the situation? In the realm of human interaction, especially in the workplace, the dynamics of everyday spats and micro-conflicts can have a significant impact on team dynamics, productivity,
Navigating Failure in Teams: Missteps vs. Misbehaviors
Failure or mistakes in teams are not always a bad thing; they are often stepping stones to success. However, it's essential to distinguish between two specific types of failure or mistakes in our business.....
Certainty and Uncertainty: The Enemy of Teams
In the realm of teamwork and collaboration, the balance between certainty and uncertainty can often be the determining factor in a team's success or failure. While we tend to associate uncertainty with chaos and instability, it's crucial to recognize that an excess of certainty, bordering on dogmatism, can be equally detrimental.
2033 – The Future of Team Productivity Has Arrived
In late 2024, Desmond Sherlock, a determined entrepreneur with a vision to transform workplace dynamics, founded SpatzAI in the bustling tech hub of Silicon Valley. Her idea was to revolutionize team dynamics by addressing minor misbehaviors and micro-conflicts in the workplace through innovative behavioral science and AI-powered solutions.
Pre-functional – Functional – Dysfunctional
I believe that the best time to setup guardrails for how the members of an organization should behave to maintain ideal functionality is from the start, pre-functional; ie. before there is a "functional" organization. It should be the foundation that the organization is built on, not an add-on when things start to go wrong.
The Wright Flyer & SpatzAI – Dare to Fly
Drawing a comparison between SpatzAI and the Wright Flyer in terms of the innovation process can provide an interesting perspective on how both groundbreaking ideas were developed. Let's explore this comparison:
The Spats Resolution Revolution: Addressing Minor Workplace Misbehavior on the Fly
Imagine a scenario where teams can use the SpatzAI intervention app to swiftly address and document their concerns on the fly instead of allowing tensions to simmer and relationships to sour.
Resolving Spatz
Just playing around with the SpatzAI toolkit handbook cover...
Speaking Up vs Talking Down
Human expression is a fundamental aspect of our existence. Speaking up, at its core, represents an intrinsic part of our nature, a vehicle through which we engage with the world.
An AI’s Summary of Our Startup Pitch
Below is an AI's appraisal of our pitch: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/key/qRIQIlrThlR6n?hostedIn=slideshare&page=upload "As an AI judge for the SLINGSHOT 2023 Deep Tech Startup Pitching Competition, I'm excited to review your submission for SpatzAI. Based on the information you've provided, here's my initial appraisal:" Title of Startup: SpatzAI Summary: SpatzAI aims to revolutionize team dynamics by utilizing AI-powered technology... Continue Reading →
What Three Words?
Imagine we were in a team and all of us agreed that we could use one of three words (in phases) to pause the conversation and protect ourselves in the event that we felt uncomfortable, offended, or threatened when we had differences of opinion. The three words were three levels or phases of objecting and... Continue Reading →
From Conflict to Conversation
I think most conflicts stem from poor delivery of the content and escalate from there. So I work on the guiding principle of splitting a conflict into two parts. 1. Agree/disagree with the content and 2. Object/accept the delivery I have found that once this process is agreed to and used well, an interesting dynamic occurs. Our discussion goes from a conflict to a conversation. We use SpatzAI to achieve this.
In Search of Objectivity
In search of Objectivity My Opinion Piece: In today's complex social landscape, our behavioral responses to situations we deem problematic can significantly impact outcomes. Upon closer examination, it has become apparent to me that individuals tend to fall into three distinct categories: the aggressive, the objective, and the submissive. Let's delve into each of these... Continue Reading →
Is the Singularity (AGI) Coming?
If we don't design and implement a global standardized intervention to monitor and address our polarized and often uncivil disagreements, the arrival of the AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is unlikely in the near future, in my opinion.
Object123 