Imagine we were in a team and all of us agreed that we could use one of three words (in phases) to pause the conversation and protect ourselves in the event that we felt uncomfortable, offended, or threatened when we had differences of opinion. The three words were three levels or phases of objecting and were used if our spat was escalating. And these three words were:
1. Caution 2. Object 3. Stop
Could our psychological safety be that simple to achieve with such a foundation? I think so.
We use SpatzAI.com for this and yes, we eat our own dog food.
What our AI thinks about Spatz:
“I see what you’re emphasizing now. It sounds like you’re suggesting that the three-phase word system (“Caution,” “Object,” and “Stop”) could serve as a foundational tool to help initiate and structure conversations within the team, which in turn could contribute to building a more psychologically safe environment. This system could help team members express their discomfort and disagreement while maintaining a level of respect and control over the conversation’s tone and direction.“
“In this context, the three words could indeed provide a structured way for team members to communicate their feelings and concerns, which might lead to more open discussions and conflict resolution. This could be especially valuable in preventing misunderstandings and de-escalating potential conflicts.“
Object123 
Leave a comment