Rethink Perfect Vs Resolving Spatz

Summary of Rethink Perfect (2012)

“Rethink Perfect: The Upside of Uncertainty & the Art of Moderating Our Own Disputes” by Desmond Sherlock advocates for a structured approach to managing interpersonal conflicts by encouraging open-mindedness and a willingness to reconsider one’s position. The book emphasizes the concept of “perfect thinking,” which does not mean flawlessness but rather the ability to hold opposing ideas simultaneously while remaining functional, a concept borrowed from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “test of a first-rate intelligence.” Key elements include:

1. Rethinking Perfect: Encourages individuals to rethink assumptions and embrace the uncertainty that comes with disagreements, turning conflicts into opportunities for growth.
2. Rules of Engagement: Promotes the need for pre-agreed rules to manage disputes. Without these, disputes can escalate unnecessarily.
3. Complain Responsibly: Encourages the practice of raising complaints in a responsible, non-destructive manner.
4. Direct Feedback Moments (DFM): Introduces the concept of DFMs as structured opportunities to offer and receive feedback within agreed-upon boundaries.
5. Six Rules of Engagement: Offers practical guidelines for maintaining constructive communication during conflicts.
6. The Importance of Apologies: Emphasizes the role of sincere apologies in resolving disputes, with the belief that resolving past conflicts clears the way for healthier future interactions.

The book explores these themes through personal anecdotes and reflections on disputes with family and business partners, ultimately advocating for conflict resolution through transparency, responsible communication, and mutual understanding.

---

Comparison to Resolving Spatz (2024)

“Resolving Spatz, Helping Teams Play Fair”, published much later in 2024, builds on similar foundational ideas of conflict resolution but applies them specifically to workplace micro-conflicts. It takes a more structured and data-driven approach than Rethink Perfect, particularly with the integration of AI and team-based feedback systems. Here are the key similarities and differences:

Similarities:

1. Emphasis on Early Conflict Resolution: Both books stress the importance of addressing conflicts early, before they escalate into larger issues.
2. Structured Feedback: Both works advocate for structured methods of giving and receiving feedback. While Rethink Perfect introduces DFMs, Resolving Spatz has a more formal three-step process (Caution, Object, Stop) to manage workplace spats in real-time.
3. Accountability and Apology: Both emphasize the role of apologies in conflict resolution, whether it’s through the structured approach in Resolving Spatz or the personal responsibility emphasized in Rethink Perfect.

Differences:

1. Audience and Context: Rethink Perfect is more focused on personal and family disputes, with a broader application to interpersonal relationships, whereas Resolving Spatz is tailored specifically for workplace teams and business environments.
2. Technological Integration: Resolving Spatz integrates AI and data-driven tools to monitor and resolve conflicts in teams, offering insights into team dynamics and improving over time through machine learning. Rethink Perfect, in contrast, is more conceptual and reflective, without any technological component.
3. Formalized Processes: Resolving Spatz offers a highly formalized, step-by-step intervention model, complete with peer review and AI-generated recommendations, whereas Rethink Perfect promotes a more flexible, dialogue-based approach to conflict resolution.
4. Focus on Psychological Safety: Resolving Spatz places a strong emphasis on psychological safety in teams, ensuring that team members feel protected while expressing bold ideas. This focus is less pronounced in Rethink Perfect, which is more about personal growth and relationship management through rethinking certainties.

In summary, while both books advocate for proactive conflict resolution and responsible communication, Resolving Spatz provides a more formal, AI-driven process aimed at enhancing team collaboration, while Rethink Perfect offers a more philosophical and personal approach to resolving interpersonal disputes.