The Conversation Conversation: What is Conversation For?

Some 40 years ago I asked a workmate what conversation was for. Her reply was that I was “fu*ked”. At the time we laughed, but the question never left me. It stayed with me for decades. After some 32 years, countless conversations about conversation, and hearing many different reasons for having them, I came up with a couple of answers that seemed to resonate.

Addressing Recursive Metacommunication

I think one of the more useful terms I’ve come across recently is "recursive metacommunication". It describes what happens when a discussion shifts from the idea itself to how the idea is being communicated, and then loops there. You’ve probably seen it: One person shares a view. The other reacts to the tone. The first defends their intent. The second frustratingly challenges that defense.

Objective Intelligence OQ with SpatzAI

For a long time I have been searching for what might help me become a little more objective, or at least a little less subjective. What I keep coming back to is this. Objectivity does not just come from better thinking. It also comes from better conditions for thinking together.

SpatzAI: Real-Time Behavioral Governance

SpatzAI is a self-managed accountability and moderation platform designed to help resolve workplace "spats" (micro-conflicts) before they escalate into major conflict resolution incidents requiring HR. Still in the concept and testing phase, Spatz focuses on improving team collaboration by protecting members from "unfair play" during difficult conversations.

Real-time Behavioral Governance

Melinda French Gates’s approach to conflict, at least in this recent post on Fortune, seems more focused on delaying feedback, with a 48-hour pause before she raises the issue. Her rule is more about raising issues honestly and with grace, so she can get her thoughts together and so her people are not blindsided later in a formal review.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑