We tend to classify anger as an emotion, alongside happiness, sadness, fear and surprise. But I think we may be conflating several different things. Consider the language. We regularly say someone is “getting angry.” Strangely, we rarely talk about someone “getting happy.” Why? Perhaps because anger, particularly in relationships, is often better understood as a process rather than simply an involuntary feeling.
What Deming Did for Production, SpatzAI Wants to Do for Difficult Workplace Conversations
TEN STEPS ON THE ROAD TO EFFICIENT (Seth Godin's Linkedin Post) "Frederick Taylor taught Henry Ford how to do mass production. Deming brought quality, systems understanding and respect for the worker. And operations research brought insight. If you have a repeated production process, the method for improving it is almost always the same, regardless of what you and your team produce:" Below is a summary of his 10 points and how the SpatzAI concept compares with them:
How do Employees Know When to Involve their Manager or HR?
How do employees know when they should involve their manager or HR, instead of working issues out between themselves?. First, let's get a few definitions and ground rules down so that we are singing from the same hymn book. The framework I am using separates disagreements from conflicts:
SpatzAI Pitch — Three Parts, One Behavioural System
Spatz is a workplace pre-grievance platform that helps teams address and resolve micro-conflicts before they escalate into formal grievances. The system has three connected parts...
Start With the Experience, Then Work Backwards to AI
Steve Jobs once gave a piece of advice that feels even more relevant today: “You’ve got to start with the customer experience first and then work backwards to the technology.” That principle matters enormously in the age of AI. The temptation now is to begin with the technology. We ask: What can AI do? Where can we apply it? What market can we sell it into? Jobs’ logic runs in the opposite direction.
Chess Board and Onboarding with SpatzAI
I have often compared onboarding with SpatzAI to learning chess. The 20-minute idea originally came from Steve Jobs, who said in 1983 that a great computer should be something you could learn to use in 20 minutes. That idea stuck. You can learn the basic moves and rules of chess surprisingly quickly. Understanding how the pieces move is not the difficult part. The challenge is learning when to make each move, how to respond to another player, and how to improve through experience.
2036 The Convergence Era: When Teams and AI Learn to Behave Together
Call this what you want, AI slop or AI smarts, not my problem. This post was generated by my prompt and some slight edits by me: "So, let’s say we get SpatzAI off the ground, you and I continue to converge, and thousands of teams successfully use SpatzChat over the next 10 years. The data from those interactions helps retrain and improve you as our leading AI. Now imagine we are 10 years into the future. In about 500 words, describe what this new era of teamwork looks like as AI and teams increasingly learn, adapt and work together."
The Backwards Route to AI Sentience
I just listened to Geoffrey Hinton talking about LLMs. What struck me was that he wasn't particularly interested in whether AI was "conscious" or "sentient." He talked instead about subjective experience. That got me thinking. Much of the discussion around AI sentience seems to travel in one direction: Greater intelligence → greater subjectivity → subjective experience → perhaps sentience. But for several years, I have been travelling almost blindly in the opposite direction. My interest has been objectivity.
It’s the Review Process, Stupid
I have been thinking about what sits underneath the SpatzAI process. Previously, I arrived at: “It’s the uncertainty, stupid.” People often hesitate to challenge workplace behaviour because they are uncertain about what will happen next. Then: “It’s the process, stupid.” Reduce the uncertainty by giving everyone an agreed, predictable process. But I think there is another layer beneath both: It’s the review process, stupid.
Fail-Prevention vs Fail-Safe
This is a short story about two very different approaches to designing the first generation of commercial jet aircraft. The British de Havilland Comet was the world’s first commercial jet airliner. Its four engines were buried inside the wing roots, close to the fuselage. It was an elegant aerodynamic solution: embedding the engines reduced drag and produced a remarkably clean aircraft.....
Object123 