Stop Calling Your Colleague a “Narcissist” and Start Addressing Their Behavior Instead

In many workplaces today, and especially on LinkedIn, the word narcissist gets tossed around like confetti. It seems that everyone has an opinion on fellow team members' mental health now. A teammate pushes back on an idea? “Classic narcissist.” A manager insists on a deadline? “Total narcissist.” Most of these snap judgements aren’t clinical insight, they’re armchair diagnoses. And once that label is out there, the conversation stops being about what actually happened. It becomes personal, polarizing, and unfair, playing the man and not the ball.

When “Practical” Advice Isn’t So Practical After All

My response to Adam’s post: “With regards feedback Grant, I believe there is either fairly delivered feedback or unfairly delivered feedback. I will accept the content of fairly delivered feedback even if I disagree with the content. I will object, however, to unfairly delivered feedback, no matter if I agree with the content or not. Feedback can be split into two parts, in my book: the content and the delivery. Personally, I think the delivery of feedback is more telling and interesting than the content.”

When a PIP Isn’t What It Seems: How SpatzAI Can Help You Push Back Fairly

If you've ever been put on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), you might have felt the ground shift under you. Suddenly, your value is in question, your targets are unclear, and your future feels pre-written. A recent viral post by employment lawyer Katherine Kleyman lays bare what many already suspect: PIPs are often not about helping employees improve, but about laying the groundwork for dismissal.

Escalate the STAIR Way

It starts the way it often does, quietly. A team member has an issue with her manager. Maybe he cut her off in a meeting. Maybe he dismissed her work publicly or was overly dogmatic in his curt response. Whatever it was, it didn’t sit right.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑