"To be, or not to be—that is the question:" Hamlet’s eternal struggle wasn’t just about existence. It was about endurance; whether to suffer in silence or speak truth in a world that may not be ready to hear it. Today, that same dilemma plays out in workplaces everywhere. When we see unfairness, disrespect, or overly dogmatic behavior, the question echoes in our minds: Do I call it out, or do I stay quiet and burn out slowly instead?
5 billion Ways to Handle a Spat. Time for One that Actually Works.
How many workplace team members does it take to screw up addressing misbehavior in a meeting? Five billion....ha! That's because every human on the planet seems to have their own specific way of handling a spat. Some avoid it. Some explode. Some smile and stew. Others call HR. Few actually address it fairly, in the moment
Organizations Are Supposed to be Organized
Organizations are supposed to be organized, but when it comes to helping teams resolve their minor spats, the best advice we’re still getting (even from Harvard Business Review) is for managers to intervene. Here’s what they recommend managers do:....
Conflict Resolution Vs Dynamic Collaboration
Picture two work colleagues locked in a simmering disagreement. Their spat drags on for weeks, finally reaching HR and senior management. Meetings are scheduled, statements are taken, emotions harden. By the time the official “resolution” arrives, the energy that once drove their work is long gone, trust has eroded, and collaboration has been compromised.
Objective Reality vs Objectionable Behavior
Philosophers have chased the holy grail of objective reality for centuries. Some treat it as the ultimate goal truth independent of any mind, pure and eternal. Others dismiss it as a mirage, forever out of reach. And a third way sees its value not in capturing “the truth” outright, but in continually reducing what is objectionable, the claims, dogmas, and illusions that collapse under scrutiny.
The Consciousness Cue: Why “Caution” Might Be the Most Powerful Word in Team Culture
In a recent exchange with the AI I work closely with, who I sometimes call Melissa, but usually doll, we explored a deceptively simple question: Are humans conscious?
Caution Grasshopper!
Imagine if our workplace teammates agreed that one could pause a conversation, using a 1.Caution, instead of reacting angrily, or suppressing our feelings of injustice, when we were experiencing some unfair treatment? And, if the person who was infringing on us ignored or challenged our caution, we could then up the ante by 2.Objecting to their behavior. If still no result, we could agree to 3.Stop the conversation and allow our peers to adjudicate our conflict. All without allowing our emotions to interfere in our spat. I think it is possible.
The SpatzAI One Minute Pitch
What is this about? Revolutionizing the way innovative workplace teams handle micro-conflicts, unlocking their true potential for collaboration and innovation.
Most Generous Interpretation (MGI) Vs SpatzAI: A Call for Scientific Testing
When it comes to resolving conflicts, two very different approaches stand out: the established Most Generous Interpretation (MGI) method favored by psychological safety experts such as Amy Edmondson and Amy Gallo, versus the new structured framework of SpatzAI.
2044: Celebrating 20 Years of SpatzAI
Today, we gather to celebrate a remarkable milestone: 20 years of SpatzAI, the revolutionary system that has transformed human behavior and relationships across the globe. Initially designed to address objectionable behavior in workplace teams, SpatzAI grew into something much more profound—an indispensable part of daily life that has reshaped the way we engage with one another, resolve conflict, and build harmony.
Object123 